|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Integrative Cancer Therapies, Vol. 5, No. 4,
315-319 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1534735406295565
Proposal for an Integrated Evaluation Model for the Study of Whole Systems Health Care in Cancer
Wayne B. Jonas, MD
Samueli Institute, 1700 Diagonal Road, Suite 400, Alexandria, VA 22314wjonas{at}siib.org
William Beckner, MIS
Samueli Institute, Alexandria, VA
Ian Coulter, PhD
Samueli Institute, Corona del Mar, CA
For more than 200 years, biomedicine has approached the treatment of disease by studying disease processes (patho-genesis), inferring causal connections and developing specific approaches for therapeutically interfering with those processes. This pathogenic approach has been highly successful in acute and traumatic disease but less successful in chronic disease, primarily because of the complex, multi-factorial nature of most chronic disease, which does not allow for simple causal inference or for simple therapeutic interventions. This article suggests that chronic disease is best approached by enhancing healing processes (salutogenesis) as a whole system. Because of the nature of complex systems in chronic disease, an evaluation model based on integrative medicine is felt to be more appropriate than a disease model. The authors propose and describe an integrated model for the evaluation of healing (IMEH) that collects multilevel "thick case" observational data in assessing complex practices for chronic disease. If successful, this approach could become a blueprint for studying healing capacity in whole medical systems, including complementary medicine, traditional medicine, and conventional primary care. In addition, streamlining data collection and applying rapid informatics management might allow for such data to be used in guiding clinical practice. The IMEH involves collection, integration, and potentially feedback of relevant variables in the following areas: (1) sociocultural, (2) psychological and behavioral, (3) clinical (diagnosis based), and (4) biological. Evaluation and integration of these components would involve specialized research teams that feed their data into a single data management and information analysis center. These data can then be subjected to descriptive and pathway analysis providing "bench and bedside" information.
Key Words: integrative medicine • cancer • healing model • social management of science • complementary medicine
References
- Antonovsky A. The salutogenic perspective: toward a new view of health and illness. Advances. 1987; 4: 47-55.
- Bell I, Koithan M. Models for the study of whole systems. Integrat Cancer Ther. 2006;293-307.
- Moerman D, Jonas W. Deconstructing the placebo effect and finding the meaning response. Ann Intern Med. 2002; 136: 471-476.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Walach H, Jonas WB. Placebo research: the evidence base for harnessing self-healing capacities. J Altern Complement Med. 2004; 10(Suppl): S103-S112.
- Kitano H. Systems biology: a brief overview. Science. 2002; 295: 5560-1662.
- Engel GL. The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. Am J Psychiatry. 1980; 137: 5-535.
- Beckman J, Fernandez C, Coulter I. A systems model of health care: a proposal. JMPT. 1991; 19: 3-208.
- Bartz R. Beyond the biopsychosocial model: new approaches to doctor-patient interactions. J Fam Pract. 1999; 48: 8-601.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Hyland M. The intelligent body and its discontents. J Health Psychol. 2002; 7: 21-32.[Abstract]
- Rodenhiser D, Mann M. Epigenetics and human disease: translating basic biology into clinical applications. CMAJ. 2006; 174: 3-341.[CrossRef]
- Usgpo. Alternative Medicine: Expanding Medical Horizons: A Report to the National Institutes of Health on Alternative Medical Systems and Practices in the US. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health;1995.
- Block KI, Block P, Gyllenhaal C. The role of optimal healing environments in patients undergoing cancer treatment: clinical research protocol guidelines. J Altern Complement Med. 2004; 10(Suppl 1): S157-S170.
- White House Commission on Complementary and Alternative Medicine Policy: Final Report 2002. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2002.
- Institute of Medicine. Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academic Press; 2005.
- Hammer MR, Jonas WB. Managing social conflict in complementary and alternative medicine research: the case of anti-neoplastons. Integr Cancer Ther. 2004; 3: 1-59.
- Jonas W, Linde K. Chapter 24. Conducting and evaluating clinical research on complementary and alternative medicine. In: Gallin J, ed. Principles and Practice of Clinical Research. San Diego: Academic Press; 2002:401-426.
- Lewith G, Walach H, Jonas W. Balanced research strategies for complementary and alternative medicine. In: Lewith G, Jonas W, Walach H, eds. Clinical Research in Complementary Therapies. London: Churchill Livingston; 2002:3-27.
- Jonas W. Policy, the public and priorities in alternative medicine research. Ann Am Acad Political Soc Sci. 2002; 583: 29-43.
- Jonas W. Evidence, ethics and evaluation of global medicine. In: Callahan D, ed. The Role of Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Accommodating Pluralism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2002:122-147.
- Jonas W. The evidence house. West J Med. 2001; 175: 79-80.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Jonas WB. Building an evidence house: challenges and solutions to research in complementary and alternative medicine. Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd. 2005; 12(3): 159-167.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Eleuteri A, Tagliaferri R, Milano L. A novel information geo-metric approach to variable selection in MLP networks. Neural Netw. 2005; 18: 10-1309.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati What's this?
|
